Sunday, October 20, 2019

Why Is Energy Medicine Useful?

Why Is Energy Medicine Important

"In every medical tradition before ours, healing was accomplished by moving energy." - Albert Szent-gyorgyi, Nobel Laureate in Medicine.
From traditional Shamans to the Ayurvedic physicians in India and the doctors of Traditional Chinese Medicine most traditional medical systems had a common belief that there was an energy flowing in the body which gave it life and health.
They also believed that imbalances and blockages in the flow of that energy lead to dysfunction and disease.  Moving the blockages and creating a harmonious and balanced flow in that energy has always been the basis of those medical systems.

Flow is important:

Some systems such as Traditional Chinese Medicine organized this energy flow into a system of channels and groupings while other traditions saw it as a general infusion of the entire body.  All believed that as long as this life-force energy (chi, ki, prana, bio-energy, etc.) was flowing properly, the body, mind and entire person was healthy.  When this flow became restricted or blocked the person would begin to exhibit dysfunction and disease of the mind or body including headaches.

Everybody wanted to fix the flow:

The goal of every system was to move the blockages and reestablish a harmonious flow to the energy.  Depending on the system this was accomplished through prayers and rituals, dietary methods, herbs, bodywork techniques such as massage and shiatsu, acupuncture and cleansing techniques such as purges, fasting, and sweats of various types.
How does the flow get blocked?
In times past the most common causes included injury, old age, dietary indiscretions, over consumption of alcohol, disease and emotional/spiritual issues including stress.

Times have changed:

Today there are many additions to that relatively simple list including heavy recreational drug use and the increased stress of modern living.  Unfortunately many things are difficult to avoid, and some that are even supposed to help you can adversely affect the flow of the life-force energy.
Pollution is everywhere, even inside your own head:
The air, water and soil are full of toxic chemicals created by our modern life.  Pesticides, fertilizers and drugs, not to mention thousands of untested chemical additives fill our food supply.
The airwaves are full of electromagnetic radiation of all kinds which scrambles the life-force energy.  Every day billions of people shoot electromagnetic waves directly into their own brain courtesy of a cell phone, or even worse a wireless headset.

Technology is a two edged sword:

There is no argument that tests like CT scans save many lives.  However, the overuse of these scans, x-rays, and mammograms, just because doctors are forced to practice defensive medicine because the family has been convinced by the  advertising spin doctors that such tests are necessary and beneficial, exposes people to very high doses of radiation.  This radiation is cumulative.  Enough exposures and radiation may build to disease producing levels in the body.
Modern medicine isn't your friend either:
Antibiotics and other medications can also be lifesavers.  Unfortunately, 100,000 people die every year from problems with prescription medications.  When you add in wrong medications, incorrect diagnosis,  botched procedures, hospital acquired infections, complications from procedures, and medication interactions that number, according to the U.S government is about 784,000 people each and every year are sent to the undertaker by the medical system in the U.S.A. alone.  There are times when medications and surgery are a necessary course of action.  Energy medicine can be a useful adjunct that enhances the action of other modalities and can can speed the healing and recovery process.

The number is growing:

According to WebM.D, 31.2 percent of us use 2 or more prescription medications each year, and 10.7 percent use 5 or more medications per year.  Many of these people suffer from headaches or chronic pain.  These combinations can lead to serious and often fatal drug overdoses and interactions.  There is even a new term to describe this growing trend, pharmageddon.  Energy medicine could help reduce those numbers.
Unintentional overdoses have now replaced car accidents as the leading cause of accidental death in 15 states and the District of Columbia.
Everything mentioned above, if it doesn't kill you outright, has the long term effect of restricting the flow of the life force energy in the body.  This long term restriction is what leads to dysfunction, and eventually disease in the body.
"All healing of every nature is the changing of the vibrations from within" - Edgar Cayce
What's a body to do?
There are actually a number of things that you can do to offset the detrimental effects of modern life and to keep the life force energy moving.  Energy medicine is a very useful tool in this process.
Please be sure to consult your licensed health care practitioner before making any major lifestyle changes.

Energy Medicine is a very useful part of an overall health plan:

It can help to move specific blockages and keep the life force energy moving so that the body can heal itself, which is what it was designed to do.
Energy medicine is especially important now to help the body offset the negative influences of modern life.  This can include things like energy therapy like Quantum touch and Reiki, massage, acupuncture, Homeopathy, foot reflexology, and Chiropractic care.  These are just a few of the techniques available.  There are many others, and many variations.  Keeping the life force energy moving is the key, and regular sessions are a great way to accomplish this.  This is extremely important in the treatment of chronic conditions and chronic pain.
Applied electromagnetic energy can elicit, control or trigger biological changes.  The degree of change is dependent on a fields strength and frequency, the duration of exposure (continuous verses intermittent), and even the predisposition of the person being exposed to the energy.
Energy medicine techniques enhance the body's electromagnetic potential for healing and are quick, cheap, mostly non-invasive and harmless.  Making them the first line of treatment would solve virtually all of society's problems with its current medical system- limited access, high cost, low touch, excessive cost, iatrogenic illness and death, in a single stroke.

Different strokes for different folks (pun intended):

Find the technique or techniques that resonate with you and use them on a regular basis as an important part of your overall health program to keep your life-force energy strong and circulating freely.  Keeping the life force flowing freely is a great way to prevent and treat chronic pain.
Prevention is always easier, less invasive and more cost effective than waiting for something to go wrong.

Exercise -  helps to keep the life force energy moving.  Both cardiovascular and resistance exercises are important parts of a balanced exercise routine.  There are many excellent books available.  You can also hire a certified personal trainer to get you started on a safe and correct routine.
Nutrition - There are many philosophies and styles of nutritional guidelines.    is a good starting point.  Dr. Mercola has many excellent articles about nutrition, and you can sign up for his free enewsletter.
"Your body is not a mechanical  is a field of energy, capable of perpetual healing" - Deepak Chopra

Cell Phone Radiation Shield - How To Avoid A Brain Tumor

A cell phone radiation shield is a very inexpensive small device that is attached to the ear piece of a cell phone. This can reduce the radiation that causes cancer that comes through the ear piece by up to 99% depending on the mobile phone that you use.
This cell phone radiation shield simply directs the radiation waves away from the ear; this is very important since the ear allows radiation into the body.
When was cancer linked with cell phones?
In 1993 a man filed a lawsuit in USA saying that his wife had died from a brain tumor caused by the use of a mobile phone. The tumor had the same shape as the antenna of the phone and was also on the same side of the head where she used the phone.
Obviously the phone manufacturers wanted to disprove any idea that there was a link between phone usage and cancer.

They spent more than $25 million on intensive research but they found out these phones can be a health risk and can cause cancer.
It has been established that cancer of the brain has increased by more than 25% since mobile phones were first used.
There have been many research studies undertaken over the past 15 years.
 An official Finnish study found that people who had used mobile phones for 10 years or more were 40% more likely to get a brain tumor on the same side of their head where they held the handset.    A blue chip Swedish research team revealed that radiation from mobile phones killed off brain cells.    Studies in both India and the U.S. have raised the possibility that the heavy use of mobile phones by men could cause reduced sperm counts.    In Australia research was carried out on mice. It was found that that radiation from mobile phones caused an increase in lymphoma in mice.  In 1998 an American research scientist showed that there was double the risk of developing tumors on the outside of the brain among mobile phone users.    Another study showed that usage of over 6 years of a mobile phone caused a 50% higher risk of developing tumors on the outside of the brain among cellphone users.    As recently as June 2010, research carried out in U.S. concluded that by spending half an hour on your mobile phone each day could increase the chance of getting brain cancer by 40%.
In San Francisco it is now law that shops selling cellphones show cell phone radiation levels of the different makes on the market.
From the above it can be seen how important it is to obtain cell phone radiation protection.
It would be hoped that a cell phone radiation shield would be fitted to every cell phone sold in order that cellular phone radiation could be virtually eliminated.
To avoid this health risk it is suggested that a cell phone radiation shield is purchased at a small cost to protect your family, especially children who are extremely susceptible to cellular phone radiation as their skulls are so much thinner than those of an adult.

Update on Prostate Cancer and Cryotherapy

The prostate gland is a walnut-sized gland that is attached to the bottom of the bladder deep in the male pelvis. The prostate gland wraps around the male urethra as it arises from the bladder, and several ducts that run between the prostate gland and the urethra allow the prostatic secretions to be expelled into the urethra at the time of ejaculation. These prostatic secretions, which constitute about 20 percent of the volume of semen, help to create the optimal chemical environment for sperm to thrive and migrate within the female genital tract, thereby enhancing sperm function.
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer that occurs in men, and the second most common cause of cancer death in men. In 2009, an estimated 192,000 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed, and approximately 27,000 men will die of this disease. Prostate cancer afflicts 1 out of every 6 American men during their lifetimes, and accounts for 25 percent of all cancer diagnoses in men (similar to the percentage of breast cancer cases among all cancer cases diagnosed in women). As with the great majority of breast cancer cases, most prostate cancers appear to be stimulated to grow and spread by sex hormones produced by the gonads (and, specifically, by testosterone and other androgens produced by the testes, and by other tissues in the body).

Almost exactly a year ago, I wrote about the emergence of cryoablation as a treatment for prostate cancer (Cryoablation and Prostate Cancer). Cryoablation uses slender probes to freeze tumors and surrounding normal tissue, and has been proposed as an alternative to surgery or radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. In July of 2008, I noted that, in most respects, cryoablation appeared to compare favorably with surgery and radiation therapy, although the incidence of impotence appeared to be much higher with cryoablation than with standard prostate cancer treatments. I also noted, at the time, that there was no prospective, randomized clinical research data available with which to make a credible and direct comparison between cryoablation and other more established treatments for prostate cancer. Now, a new prospective, randomized clinical research trial comparing cryoablation with radiation therapy has reported its early results in the journal Cancer.
In this Canadian study, 244 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer localized to the prostate gland were randomly assigned to undergo either standard external beam radiation treatment or cyroablation. These volunteers with prostate cancer were then followed for 3 years after completing their treatment. Because it is still too early to draw conclusions about cancer recurrence and survival in this group of prostate cancer patients, this preliminary report addresses quality-of-life issues related to these two forms of cancer therapy.

The men who underwent cryoablation reported more difficulties with urination than the men who were treated with radiation early after treatment, although these symptoms resolved over time. The cryotherapy group also reported significantly higher rates of long-term impotence when compared with the men who received radiation therapy. In fact, 3 years after treatment, there was a 13 percent greater incidence of moderate-to-severe sexual dysfunction among the cryotherapy group of men when compared to the radiation therapy group.

The preliminary results of this prospective, randomized clinical research trial suggest that the main long-term quality-of-life difference between cryotherapy and radiation therapy is a significantly greater incidence of long-term sexual dysfunction following cryotherapy.
As I concluded in my last update of cryotherapy for prostate cancer treatment, one year ago, the long-term benefits and risks of this form of treatment are not fully understood at this time, as we lack mature long-term prospective, randomized clinical research data with which to make prudent decisions about this treatment modality. Aside from a higher incidence of sexual dysfunction following cryotherapy, it is still too soon to tell if the long-term survival outcomes with cryotherapy will compare favorably with radiation therapy and surgery. Therefore, for now, I can only recommend cryotherapy for prostate cancer if it is performed within an approved clinical research trial. Stay tuned for further updates on this topic as they become available.
Disclaimer: As always, my advice to readers is to seek the advice of your physician before making any significant changes in medications, diet, or level of physical activity
Dr. Wascher is an oncologic surgeon, a professor of surgery, a widely published author, and a Surgical Oncologist at the Kaiser Permanente healthcare system in Orange County, California

Wi-Fi in Schools: Is it Affecting your Children's Health ?

Installing Wi-Fi in schools has become pretty much routine in the last few years. It seems like a good thing in many ways. But more and more parents are becoming concerned about the effect of wireless radiation on their children's health-and for good reason.
Doctors and Scientists Question Safety Regulations
An increasing number of medical associations, medical doctors and scientists have expressed their concerns about the safety of Wi-Fi in schools. These concerns are based on:

1. The number of children who, since Wi-Fi was installed in their schools, are experiencing:
  headaches fatigue nausea chest pain vision problems sleep disturbances

2. An alarming rise in many children's disorders in the last few years, such as ADHD, allergies, asthma, and autism-roughly the same time period in which Wi-Fi has been installed in schools.

3. The increasing amount of research that has been done linking many different diseases with radiation from wireless devices.

Children are Even More Sensitive to Wireless Radiation than Adults
Scientists and parents are especially concerned because of the fact that children's nervous systems and brains are still developing and are therefore more vulnerable to the effects of Wi-Fi radiation than the average adult. British physicist and former navy and intelligence adviser, Dr. Barrie Trower states:

"Children are physiologically and neurologically immature. It takes years for the blood-brain barrier to form, leaving children more prone to cell-leakage from microwave radiation. And a person's immune system, which fights off damage, takes 18 years to develop."
Medical Associations and Government Agencies Issue Warnings
Based on the ever-increasing research about the hazards of radiation, especially to children, a number of medical associations world-wide have now made public warnings and recommendations regarding children and wireless radiation:

  The Council of Europe: Wired internet connections are preferred, and cell phone use by pupils in schools to be strictly regulated. Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Recommends use of wired networks in schools and educational institutions. International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety: Strongly advises limited use of mobile phones and other similar devices by young children and teenagers. European Environment Agency: All reasonable measures should be taken to reduce exposures to electromagnetic fields, especially radiofrequencies from cell phones and particularly the exposures to children and young adults.
In addition, the German Government and the Israeli Parliament have recommended wired computer networks for schools.

School Authorities 

Most school authorities are not interested in hearing about the health hazards of Wi-Fi. They've spent lots of money in having it installed and enjoy the convenience of it. And, besides, only a small percentage of children appear to be having problems with it.
What they don't realize is that these children are simply those who are more sensitive to radiation than the others. For whatever reason, their bodies are more vulnerable to the radiation and they're showing symptoms now. They are the "canaries in the mine".
The more hardy children aren't showing symptoms at this point; but radiation damage in the body is cumulative. It will likely show up down the road, when it might mean more serious consequences.
Haven't we learned our lesson with tobacco? How long did it take authorities to catch up with that one? There had been evidence of the link between tobacco and cancer long before they finally decided they couldn't ignore it anymore.

What You Can Do

If you're concerned about your children's health and the long days they spend with Wi-Fi at school, there are some things you can do.
Petitions: There are parents in the U.S. and Canada who've signed petitions with varying results with their school authorities. Certain parents who have gotten nowhere on that track have started a class action. Check online for more details.
EMF Protection: Something else you can do is check out electromagnetic (EMF) protection for your children. There are devices children can wear, which are preferable because wireless radiation is everywhere these days, not just at school. There are also devices to plug into your children's laptops, if they have their own.
Also, there are devices to use at home, important if you have a wireless router in your home.

You Can Protect Your Children

Let's face it: Wi-Fi is likely here to stay-everywhere, not just in your children's schools. We're all too addicted to it, and authorities tend to take a long time to take measures to protect our health. However, you can take action at your children's schools as other concerned parents have. Or you can take precautions against radiation with EMF protection devices.
Either way, you can know you're doing what you can to protect your children's health.

Are Cell Phones Going To Cause More Casualties Than World War 2 ?

Are You Microwaving Your Children's Heads?

The fact is ALL cell and cordless phones emit electromagnetic radiation. Studies over the last few years indicate a strong connection between cell phone use and health problems. Children and teens who begin to use mobile phones before the age of 20 are at the greatest risk. So what can you do? There is a way to provide protection when you and your children use cell and cordless phones and that is with a radiation shield or cellular protection system. But is this really that effective in blocking radiation from cell phones?

Of course, it's not only cell phone waves that we should be worried about:
In the summer of 2006, a super-Wi-Fi system known as WiMAX was tested in rural Sweden. Bombarded with signals, the residents of the village of G? tene-who had no knowledge that the transmitter had come online-were overcome by headaches, difficulty breathing, and blurred vision, according to a Swedish news report. Two residents reported to the hospital with heart  happened only hours after the system was turned on, and as soon as it was powered down, the symptoms disappeared.

These radiation shields promotes protection when you make or receive a call on your cell and cordless phones by helping to reduce the impact of electromagnetic energy threatening your health. The radiation shield is made from special material that has been proven and tested to block up to 99% of the harmful radiation coming off the antenna from entering yours and your children's inner ear. The ear is the highest absorption rate of radiation in the body and most of the reports of tumors and health problems have been directly behind the ear.
There is a growing concern out there today and we will not be silenced forever. More and more countries are coming back with reports and documents that show the dangers of radiation, yet somehow these reports seem to get lost and never seen by the public eye.
When you think how dangerous this is, you start to see what kind of impact this is going to have for generations to come. The life expectancy will drastically decrease because everyone is going to be physically ill from all the radiation. There will be no way to escape it.
There are several different products that have been developed in response to the growing concern about cell phone radiation but which ones actually work. A former advertising executive decided to take action and find a way to block the radiation from our cell phones. After seeing an ABC 20/20 report on cell phone dangers on October 20, 1999 he found patented material in Asia that blocked radiation from penetrating the material.

Beginning in January of 2000 the first radiation shield product for cell phones was produced, series 1000, sent to an FTC listed lab for testing on phones and the results showed the radiation shield 1000 blocked up to 97% of the radiation from entering the soft tissue of the ear where all the nerves and blood cells are located. This was followed by Series 2000 gold mesh which testing proved blocks up to 99% of the radiation from entering the inner ear.
Additional testing was done in Germany and Russia all proving the radiation shield did exactly as it claimed in protecting individuals from potential health risks.
Using the radiation Shield on all mobile phones is your best defense against the harmful radiation that is being absorbed into the heads of adults and children when using a mobile phone. Research has revealed Children absorb as much as double the amount of radiation through their heads as adults. Why take a chance? Make your mobile phones as safe as can be and use a protective device on yours and your children's phones starting right now.

Source :

Sunday, July 22, 2018

What Motive of Shooting at Fallon Church Nevada

An alleged shooter is in custody after an early afternoon shooting at a Mormon church in Fallon, according to a city spokesperson.

Spokeswoman Kaitlin Ritchie says the shooting happened on Sunday, July 22 at the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on Richards Street.

One person is dead following a shooting at a Fallon church and a second has a leg injury, Fallon Police Chief Kevin Gehman said Sunday.

At a grim press conference attended by Gehman and Fallon Mayor Ken Tedford and other officials, some of the details of the shooting at Mormon church at 750 W. Richards St. were revealed.

Gehman said John O’Connor walked into the church just before 1 p.m. and fired shots, then left the church and walked home. O'Connor surrendered after authorities called the home and asked him to surrender.

“It’s really too early to understand the motive,” Gehman said. It does not appear to be an attack on the church, which had as many as 50 people at the time, but a person.

Gehman acknowledged the victims’ names are on social media, but said they are giving time for family members to learn of the incident before releasing their names.

“Our hearts go out to family members of those who have lost someone and those who were in the church today where the tragedy occurred,” Tedford said.

1 Death in Fallon church shooting nevada

Police have confirmed a shooting during a sacrament meeting today in an LDS meetinghouse in Fallon, Nevada.

"There was a shooting," said Kaitlin Ritchie, Fallon City marketing and communications coordinator. "The shooter is in custody. The investigation is ongoing as of right now."
shoot at curch nevadaa today

Ritchie said police would release more information later this afternoon.

"We have not confirmed any injuries or fatalities at this time," she said.

The shooting took place after the sacrament was passed in the Fallon Third Ward in the Fallon South Stake Center, 750 W. Richards Street, said Rich Hutchings, a member of the ward.

Read Also : Fallon Church Shooting motive

Two people were injured in the shooting, with one man’s injuries serious enough to be transported to a hospital.

The shooting happened in front of the congregation, and the suspected gunman was taken into custody.

LDS Church spokesman, Eric Hawkins, released this statement Sunday afternoon:

“We have recently learned of a shooting in Fallon, Nevada, during a church service. Details are still developing, and inquiries should be directed to local law enforcement personnel. We express our love to those in this congregation and our prayers for the victims and their families. Local leaders are ministering to them at this time.”

This is a developing story and will be updated as new information becomes available.

Update News :

One person is dead following a shooting at a Fallon church and a second has a leg injury, Fallon Police Chief Kevin Gehman said Sunday.

At a grim press conference attended by Gehman and Fallon Mayor Ken Tedford and other officials, some of the details of the shooting at Mormon church at 750 W. Richards St. were revealed.

Gehman said John O’Connor walked into the church just before 1 p.m. and fired shots, then left the church and walked home. O'Connor surrendered after authorities called the home and asked him to surrender.